01
Required disclosures
Check whether defined statements, notices, and approved language appear when the interaction requires them.
Evaluate eligible voice and digital interactions against your approved requirements, surface potential exceptions, and give operations and compliance teams the evidence needed to review and respond. Use Happitu directly or add Customer Direct implementation and managed monitoring.
Up to 100%
Of eligible connected interactions
Voice + digital
Phone, chat, and email monitoring
Powered by Happitu
AI-assisted with human review controls
Interaction review
Illustrative example / inbound voice
Scorecard
Account servicing
Review state
Human review
Required account disclosure
Disclosure not found before account discussion
Identity verification
Two approved verification points completed
Approved account language
No configured language exception detected
Escalation procedure
Specialist handoff completed with context
Evidence for review
Review the opening account discussion and determine whether the approved disclosure requirement applied.
Transcript reference / 00:18–00:42
Monitoring criteria should reflect your approved policies, interaction types, and operating responsibilities. Clear requirements can be evaluated consistently at scale while material or contextual findings remain subject to human review.
01
Check whether defined statements, notices, and approved language appear when the interaction requires them.
02
Monitor whether required identity, account, consent, and authorization steps were completed before protected actions.
03
Evaluate observable handling requirements without forcing every conversation into the same rigid path.
04
Surface defined phrases, claims, commitments, and language patterns that require closer review.
05
Confirm whether approved interaction details, outcomes, and next steps were captured for follow-through.
06
Identify interactions where required escalation, reporting, or specialist handoff procedures may not have been followed.
Happitu applies the monitoring criteria and organizes the evidence. Your team or Customer Direct reviews what matters, manages the response, and tracks whether the same risk continues.
01
Translate approved policies and procedures into observable criteria, applicable conditions, and escalation rules.
02
Bring eligible interactions and approved metadata into Happitu from supported voice and digital sources.
03
Compare automated and human evaluations, clarify definitions, and keep subjective criteria under human review.
04
Apply the appropriate scorecards and surface potential exceptions with the supporting interaction evidence.
05
Review material findings, document the disposition, and route validated exceptions through the agreed process.
06
Track recurring risk, corrective action, coaching needs, and whether changes improve adherence over time.
Start with the operating model that matches your team. Customer Direct can support the technology, run the monitoring process, or include it inside a broader outsourced customer operation.
01
Equip your internal quality or compliance team with configurable scorecards, automated evaluations, interaction evidence, dashboards, and review controls.
02
Add Customer Direct implementation, calibration, analyst review, recurring reporting, and operating support without replacing the team handling your interactions.
03
Build monitoring into a Customer Direct service program with shared criteria, transparent evidence, calibration, escalation, and corrective-action reporting.
Monitoring should make review more consistent, not turn an AI score into an unquestioned decision. Happitu supports automated and manual evaluation within the same governed quality process.
Apply different criteria by workspace, channel, direction, workflow, and interaction type.
Automate clear, observable requirements while reserving contextual or subjective decisions for people.
Reviewers can validate evidence, adjust scores, document decisions, and retain human authority over material findings.
Compare evaluators, refine ambiguous criteria, and use documented dispute workflows to improve consistency.
Move from scorecard trends to the relevant interaction, transcript, criterion, and review disposition.
Monitoring supports oversight. Your legal and compliance stakeholders remain responsible for interpreting requirements, approving criteria, and determining the appropriate response to a validated exception.
Published Happitu customer result
20+
Management hours saved
Ostro Health used Happitu to standardize evaluation criteria, automate scoring against defined requirements, centralize quality documentation, and provide compliance and legal leaders with direct access to reporting for a regulated nurse navigator program.
Standardized evaluation criteria
Automated scoring against defined requirements
Compliance dashboards and audit-supporting reporting
Centralized adverse-event oversight
Results shown are from one Happitu customer program. Outcomes vary by operation, volume, implementation, and client process.
Happitu supports integrations with contact center, communications, CRM, and industry platforms. Customer Direct confirms eligible interactions, available metadata, permissions, and reporting needs before implementation.
Integration availability, channels, metadata, and data movement vary by platform and program. Custom requirements are confirmed during solution design.
Begin with a limited interaction population and objective criteria. Expand after the source data, evaluation logic, human-review process, and reporting cadence are working as intended.
01
Identify the approved policies, interaction populations, evidence requirements, decision owners, and escalation paths for the program.
02
Confirm channels, integrations, metadata, recording quality, retention, redaction, permissions, and interaction eligibility.
03
Build scorecards, test representative interactions, compare human and automated results, and approve production criteria.
04
Define review queues, escalation timing, recurring reports, corrective-action ownership, and criteria-change control.
Compliance monitoring focuses on approved requirements and potential exceptions. Conversation intelligence and quality assurance answer related questions about customer demand, service performance, and coaching priorities.
Analyze intent, topics, sentiment, outcomes, and recurring friction across customer conversations.
Explore Conversation IntelligenceSee why isolated samples can miss disclosure, escalation, policy, and data-handling risks across a contact center.
Read the ArticleWhat teams should know about monitoring scope, Happitu, human review, integrations, data handling, implementation, and program responsibility.
Contact center compliance monitoring evaluates customer interactions against approved requirements such as disclosures, verification steps, documentation, policy language, and escalation procedures. Happitu applies configured scorecards at scale, while your team or Customer Direct can review evidence and manage follow-through.
No. Monitoring increases oversight and helps surface potential exceptions for review. Your legal and compliance stakeholders remain responsible for interpreting requirements, approving monitoring criteria, determining whether an exception occurred, and deciding the appropriate response.
Yes. Your internal quality or compliance team can use the Happitu platform directly. Customer Direct can also provide implementation, calibration, analyst review, reporting, and ongoing managed monitoring when you need additional operating support.
Yes. Monitoring can be built into a Customer Direct service program using client-approved scorecards, shared calibration, transparent evidence, documented escalation, and recurring performance reporting.
Happitu can analyze up to 100% of eligible interactions received through configured sources. Actual coverage depends on channel availability, recording and transcript quality, interaction eligibility, integration scope, and program rules. Coverage and exclusions should be reported with the monitoring results.
It does not have to. Clear and observable requirements can be evaluated automatically, while subjective or material findings can require human review. Happitu supports manual evaluations, reviewer overrides, calibration, and documented agent disputes.
Existing scorecards can provide the starting point. Customer Direct helps clarify definitions, applicability rules, weights, evidence requirements, and which criteria are appropriate for automated evaluation before the scorecard is used in production.
Programs can monitor supported voice, chat, and email interactions. Happitu integrates with several contact center, communications, CRM, and industry platforms. Customer Direct confirms available channels, metadata, permissions, and implementation requirements during discovery.
Recording disclosure, retention, access, redaction, data flow, roles, and system permissions are defined for each program. Happitu reports completion of a SOC 2 Type II examination and provides role-based access controls, sensitive-data redaction, and supporting security documentation through its Trust Center.
Timing depends on policy complexity, source systems, security review, scorecard readiness, data quality, calibration requirements, and escalation design. A focused pilot can begin with one interaction source, one team, and a limited set of objective criteria before expanding.
Pricing depends on interaction volume, channels, integrations, data retention, scorecard complexity, reporting, and whether your team uses Happitu directly or adds Customer Direct implementation and managed review. We scope the platform and service model around your monitoring requirements.
Tell us which interactions, policies, disclosures, verification steps, or escalation procedures require oversight. We will help define the right platform, criteria, review process, and service model.
